nvNeuralVerge
Startup & Funding Data

Futurepedia Tool Reviews API and MCP — User Ratings and Review Text

Send a tool slug or link and get its user reviews: the star rating, the review text (plain and as HTML), the reviewer's name and a link to the review. Set max_items to cap how many come back (up to 250).

You send
a Futurepedia tool slug or link, and how many reviews you want (up to 250)
You get back
rating, review text and reviewer name for each user review of the tool
Coverage
Futurepedia records with a public page.
Price
1 point per returned record — $1 per 1,000
Billed per record actually returned, capped by max_items. A request that returns nothing costs nothing.
Comparison

Ways to get this data

Three approaches teams use today, and where each one runs into trouble.

ApproachWhat it takesCostTrade-off
Futurepedia directlyOpen the page on Futurepedia and scroll through the listFree, and slowFine for one record, useless across a list, and the layout differs on every platform
Building a scraperWrite it, host it, and repair it when Futurepedia changes its pagesEngineering timeA maintenance commitment for something that isn't your product
NeuralVergeOne request, the same shape as every other source in the catalog$1 per 1,000, misses not billedReturns what Futurepedia publishes at request time. Other platforms are separate sources with the same request format
Response

What you get back

Every field in the example response below.

FieldTypeDescription
session_idstringId of this run, for tracing.
kindstringSource type of the response.
toolstringThe tool you sent.
max_itemsnumberThe cap you sent on returned records.
start_pagenumberFirst page read.
partialbooleanTrue when the run stopped before reaching max_items.
humanstringReadable summary: query, result count and a traffic line.
machine.total_itemsnumberNumber of records returned in this response.
machine.items[]arrayThe returned records, each with the fields listed below.
machine.first_itemobjectA copy of the first record in items[], for a quick read.
machine.total_foundnumber|nullTotal matches when the platform reports one; null when it does not.
machine.page_countnumberPages read for this response.
machine.blockedbooleanTrue if the platform refused the read.
machine.proxy_traffic_bytesnumberTraffic used by the run, in bytes.
total_pointsnumberPoints charged: 1 per returned record.
machine.first_item.idstringReview id.
machine.first_item.namestringReviewer name, same as reviewer_name.
machine.first_item.urlstringLink to the review on the tool page.
machine.first_item.toolstringTool slug.
machine.first_item.ratingnumberStar rating given.
machine.first_item.textstringReview text.
machine.first_item.text_htmlstringReview text as HTML.
machine.first_item.reviewer_namestringReviewer name.
machine.first_item.reviewer_uidstringReviewer's Futurepedia user id.
machine.first_item.reviewer_photonullNull in the sample; no photo is set.
Response

Example response

A real response, as returned.

{
  "session_id": "11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111",
  "kind": "futurepedia_tools_reviews",
  "tool": "midjourney",
  "max_items": 2,
  "start_page": 1,
  "partial": false,
  "human": "# Futurepedia — tool reviews\n\n- **Tool:** midjourney\n- **Results:** 2 of 4 found\n- **Proxy traffic:** 222.8 KB",
  "machine": {
    "total_items": 2,
    "first_item": {
      "id": "7c1169c6-c664-45ba-a147-c3b6a6aa8fe9",
      "name": "Vivek Varma",
      "url": "https://www.futurepedia.io/tool/midjourney#review-7c1169c6-c664-45ba-a147-c3b6a6aa8fe9",
      "tool": "midjourney",
      "rating": 5,
      "text": "Very realistic images can be generated from fairly simple prompts. Would be even better if it was possible to use it on the web instead of only in Discord.",
      "text_html": "<p>Very realistic images can be generated from fairly simple prompts. Would be even better if it was possible to use it on the web instead of only in Discord.</p>",
      "reviewer_name": "Vivek Varma",
      "reviewer_uid": "6ZtKMUhY7VWYxSzLvJQ88KrJ7En2",
      "reviewer_photo": null
    },
    "items": [
      {
        "id": "7c1169c6-c664-45ba-a147-c3b6a6aa8fe9",
        "name": "Vivek Varma",
        "url": "https://www.futurepedia.io/tool/midjourney#review-7c1169c6-c664-45ba-a147-c3b6a6aa8fe9",
        "tool": "midjourney",
        "rating": 5,
        "text": "Very realistic images can be generated from fairly simple prompts. Would be even better if it was possible to use it on the web instead of only in Discord.",
        "text_html": "<p>Very realistic images can be generated from fairly simple prompts. Would be even better if it was possible to use it on the web instead of only in Discord.</p>",
        "reviewer_name": "Vivek Varma",
        "reviewer_uid": "6ZtKMUhY7VWYxSzLvJQ88KrJ7En2",
        "reviewer_photo": null
      },
      {
        "id": "899de061-0adc-4dfb-ac5b-0aae56d7fb6e",
        "name": "Jason kung",
        "url": "https://www.futurepedia.io/tool/midjourney#review-899de061-0adc-4dfb-ac5b-0aae56d7fb6e",
        "tool": "midjourney",
        "rating": 4,
        "text": "no more Free Trial for now",
        "text_html": "<p>no more Free Trial for now</p>",
        "reviewer_name": "Jason kung",
        "reviewer_uid": "8ZY63aGSElajRraQ2HSLn9x2KES2",
        "reviewer_photo": null
      }
    ],
    "total_found": 4,
    "page_count": 1,
    "blocked": false,
    "proxy_traffic_bytes": 228185
  },
  "total_points": 2
}
Integration

How to run it

The same lookup works from the app, the API, or as a tool an agent can call mid-task.

Results come back in the same envelope as every other source: a session id, a readable summary, the structured result and the points charged. max_items caps how many records are returned and billed.

curl -X POST https://api.neuralverge.ai/functions/v1/run-futurepedia-tools-reviews \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"tool":"midjourney","max_items":2}'
Use cases

What teams use it for

Where this field shows up in an actual workflow.

Sentiment reading

Read what users say about a tool, with the rating attached to each review.

Product feedback

Collect review text about your own tool or a competitor's.

Review-count checks

Compare total_found with the review_count on the tool record.

Qualitative research

Pull review text as input for a summary or theme analysis.

Coverage & limits

Coverage, freshness and limits

What this source covers, how fresh it is, and where it stops.

Coverage

Futurepedia records with a public page.

Freshness

Read at request time, so the answer reflects the platform as it stands when you ask.

Handling

This source returns information Futurepedia shows publicly. Every response carries the session id you can trace.

What it will not do
  • —Reviews are user-written and a tool may have few of them, as the 4 in the sample.
  • —Each review includes the reviewer's name and user id as Futurepedia shows them. Use them for aggregate reading, not for profiling the individuals.
  • —Only rating and text are returned, with no reply or vote counts.
FAQ

Questions, answered

Yes. text is the plain version and text_html carries the same review with markup.

Related

Related sources

Try futurepedia tool reviews on your own data

One request format across every source in the catalog.

Get started